been too busy to blog . . .

30 07 2008

keeping up with Mona in the hospital . . . your prayers are (still and always) welcome!

and struggling with myself . . . is it that I need to be the savior? Is this my internalized superiority at work?

people who don’t know my sister Mona don’t understand the relationship. It’s hard to put into words what Mona gives me in return . . . most simply put, I suppose I would describe it as “unconditional love” . . . but I know that she is in my life so that I can learn from her, too. I don’t want the relationship to be so unbalanced. I don’t want it to seem like I am the Great White Savior. [WARNING: THIS LINK'S BLOG TITLE USES A WORD I DON'T LIKE TO SAY!] I want people to understand that God has formed us as sisters in a way I can’t even describe or understand, and that Mona is in my life (and I in hers) for His purposes. 

But I still question my own motives at times . . .





Sunday blogging against racism #35–”Get your camp on”

18 05 2008

[not that anybody noticed, but I missed last week, and since I'm on a roll, I figured I would include both of these . . . ]

I know that my alma mater has bigger problems than this at the moment, but I have to admit that the recent crop of billboards that has shown up in my neighborhood, imploring kids to “get your camp on!”, kind of bothers me. I know that I should appreciate the fact that they’re reaching out to kids across the city, but it’s the whole “trying to be hip” feel of the ads that bugs me. (maybe because it reminds me too much of myself?! hmmm.) 

But these billboards reminded me again of some other ”camp woes” I’ve had recently, talking to Mona’s sons about Kids Across America camp, where they will hopefully all be going at the end of June. KAA, with its stated goal of “equipping urban youth and their leaders” is exactly the kind of camp I *want* Mona’s boys to attend. 

But her youngest, Michael, recently told me, “I don’t think I’m going to KAA. I’m going to too many camps this summer, and I don’t want to go to another camp.”

“Okay, Michael, what other camps are you going to this summer?”

Spring Hill . . . and maybe another one.” 

Of course he’s going to Spring Hill. Every year, they offer scholarships to inner city kids to attend this (otherwise lily-white) camp. And it’s a beautiful, extremely well-equipped camp, and yes, it’s great that they provide these opportunities.  

                                                            

The thing about Mona, and perhaps I’ve said this before, is that  there is a certain spark in her; you just can’t help but love her. And that spark is something that she has passed on to her sons, and it’s this, I think, that makes people eager to do things for them. That’s why I try to cut her some slack about sending her boys to “the white church”, because I recognize that she is a mom trying to get her sons as many opportunities as she possibly can.

It is because of this way Mona has of endearing herself to people that her sons have had the opportunity to attend quite a few camps over the years. I am glad for this, but at the same time I have been intentional about wanting them to go to KAA this year, and I told Michael as much. Though his white auntie was probably the last person he expected to hear say this, I made it quite clear to him that “I don’t want you just going to all of those ‘white’ camps.”

It’s bad enough that they already have it in their heads that it’s always the benevolent white folks who provide these opportunities . . . I don’t want them to get the message that camp is merely a place where they go to be recipients of someone else’s kindness. I want them to see people of color in charge, as role models, as counselors and as leaders. I want them to aspire to give back, and not just to receive yet another “token” invitation that helps us as the white folks feel so good about what we’re doing for “those poor, disadvantaged youth”. 

I thank God for Camp Tall Turf, and I know that Mona’s sons (or at least some of them) have been there. But that is only one camp, and I’m fairly certain that the Lewis boys have been to about half a dozen different camps in their lifetime, so that one camp is barely enough to stem the tide. All I can say is that my nephews WILL be “getting their camp on” at KAA this summer, if I have anything to say about it. 





Sunday blogging against racism #34 –racial tension at the bingo hall.

18 05 2008

I just wanted to spend a couple of relaxing hours playing bingo. And I am pretty sure that this is what just about everybody there wanted, although my “once-every-three-weeks” habit is on a slightly different pattern than that of most of the people there . . . (I once heard one woman tell a friend, “I haven’t been going as much lately . . . I’m down to about three or four times a week.” !!!)

If you’d asked me before yesterday, I would have launched into a lovely schpiel about how bingo is the great equalizer, how people of all ages and all walks of life co-exist peacefully (except when the caller is too slow, or too fast, or when a newbie like myself inadvertently breaks one of the 621 unspoken laws of the bingo hall . . . ) But since I’ve started visiting a new-to-me bingo hall, I’ve seen a few cracks in the formerly shiny verneer of my “we’re all the same at the bingo hall” fantasy. 

I had seen a few moments of tension at this particular bingo hall in the past, but what I witnessed yesterday was more intense than previous ones, and harder to attribute to something other than racism.  

I don’t know how it started, but all of a sudden, this crotchety old white woman who was one of the workers  (or whatever they’re called) that day was yelling at an African-American woman, “And if you keep it up, I’ll call the police!” Of course, at this point she had everybody’s attention. What had the woman done? Had she lit up a joint at the table? (not that you’d be able to tell with all the smoke in there, anyway!) Had she stolen someone else’s dauber? Had she tampered with the bingo calling equipment?

No. She had answered a cell phone call. (This particular bingo hall had recently banned the use of cell phones during games.)

Lest you think I’m prematurely racializing this, please bear with me. 

There was a great deal of murmering going on among the women sitting in my general area. I was upset too. “call the police”? because she took a call? I’m sure the woman knew the rules . . . she was by herself, so she would have had nobody to watch her cards while she left the room to take a call . . . and she must have had some legitimate need to take the call. (she was an older woman–probably in her 40’s or 50’s–I say that because she wasn’t some young kid with the phone glued to her ear.)

The woman was visibly upset by the interaction, and quickly took her call out to the hallway . . . but for me, the mood had been broken, and my “fun” afternoon of bingo had gone downhill rather quickly. The next few times the woman’s phone rang, I saw her walking very quickly towards the exit, and she certainly looked stressed, if not downright afraid.

It didn’t help that at one point, I looked over at where she was sitting, and saw her dabbing at her eyes . . . yes, I think she was crying. What I had interpreted in her face as anger a moment before was now transformed in my mind to something much more heart-wrenching. And although it’s possible that her tears (if they were indeed more than just a reaction to the smoke in the air, as I suspect that they were) were tears of anger, they still broke my heart. I could feel the humiliation she felt at having been spoken to like she was a child, or worse. And i felt myself in this strange no-man’s-land once again, as someone with the external appearance of the oppressor, but having (at least to some extent) the mind of the oppressed.

My anti-racism radar (not to mention my pathological codependency) fully engaged, I started to hone in on rumblings and to notice some things:

  • All of the bingo workers were white, and come to think of it, I didn’t remember ever having seen an African-American working at a bingo game in Grand Rapids. This got me thinking about the whole ”gatekeepers” concept and the question of who has access to the power.
  • Probably 40 to 50% of the players were African-American (I didn’t count). If “they” would get together and boycott this bingo hall, there would be a serious loss of revenue at this particular game. (I’ll leave it to someone else to talk about the exploitative nature of bingo and other forms of gambling . . . I’m still in denial on that one.) In fact, since I am such a <tongue in cheek>Cool White Person</tongue in cheek>, I actually said as much to a woman at the next table. (I hope I said “we” and not “you”, but I can’t be sure. But seriously, and this is NOT something I’m saying to make myself sound like the CWP that I am, but I was upset enough that I DON’T want to go back to that particular bingo hall now.)
  • Some of the women at the next table over were saying, “I stopped coming here for a while after that LAST incident.”, so clearly this was not the first time there had been this type of conflict.
  • At one point, there was some flap over someone who had won one of the games (an African-American woman sitting two tables over from me), and I heard a snippet of a conversation between some of the workers–”look out for ________” (I didn’t catch exactly what the offense was, but from the context, I got the sense that it was an accusation of cheating or some kind of deception). Then I heard the worker say words that made me shudder . . . “they do that . . . they come in late and they _______” (fill in the blank with some bingo terminology that  probably would not have made sense to me even if I HAD heard it.) Oh no. She said “they“. I heard it (remember, at this point my antennae were already tuned) and my heart sunk. I tried to convince myself that I hadn’t heard what I thought I had heard. Surely this white woman with the bad haircut had only meant “they” in the generic “bingo players” sense. Surely she hadn’t meant, “those people who come into OUR bingo hall”. But try as I might, I just could not convince myself that I had interpreted it wrong.

The thing is, I spent the rest of the afternoon looking at the crotchety old white woman with disdain and anger, keeping an eye on her lest she try some other antics . . . but then I stopped, and reminded myself that, rather than praying, “I thank You, God, that I am not like that sinner”, that I ought to keep in mind my own racism, buried though it may be under a flurry of well-intentioned words and attempts at “I’m-not-like-THOSE-white-people” coolness. And the problem, after all, is not that one crotchety old woman, but rather the deeper racism that hangs over all of our heads like the stale smoke of the bingo hall . . .

But it still broke my heart to realize that even here, in this seemingly benign setting, the racial divide was once again rearing its ugly head, showing up so clearly for those with eyes to see it. And I wanted to shut my eyes to it . . . I wanted to not see, to pretend that what I had seen didn’t mean what I knew in my heart of hearts that it meant. 

I just  wanted to play bingo. I just wanted to have some fun on a Saturday afternoon. And yet, I walked into a landmine . . . because this isn’t just a “Lorraine” thing–”there she goes again!”–no. if you open your eyes, it’s everywhere . . .

and I’m just not ready to shut up about it.  





Huckabee: NOT funny. (this one can’t wait for Sunday.)

17 05 2008

Is this seriously going to be a non-item? Come on, folks! I’m sure that the man will say that it was “merely” a dig at Obama’s position on gun control . . . but I don’t find anything even REMOTELY funny about a white (”CHRISTIAN”) Republican making jokes about someone trying to shoot Senator Obama.

And maybe Field is right . . .  maybe it’s true that this country isn’t ready for a black president . . . but I am not giving up just yet . . .  even if 68% of people polled on our local right-wing talk radio station didn’t think that this t-shirt was offensive . . . even if I saw with my own eyes the Secret Service swarming all over downtown Grand Rapids when Obama was in town . . .





Sunday blogging against racism #33–”It’s just a cartoon”

4 05 2008

So yesterday, as I was babysitting for the CUTEST kids ever, we were watching old Looney Tunes cartoons that had been given to the kids by their grandma. Since this was to me a better choice than revisionist crap such as Elmo’s World or (horror of horrors)–Blues’ Clues post-Steve (!!!), I was happy that the Ethan Bean had chosen this. AND I was really amazed that a three-year-old and two almost-two-year-olds were so mesmerized by these “old-school” cartoons.

Things got “interesting”, however, and my anti-racist antennae (sp?!) went up, when we came upon a short titled, “Frigid Hare“. Besides, “oh, look at the cute little penguin who cries ice cubes!” (the girls were like, “baby!” Apparently any small, cute creature, themselves included, is a “baby!”) the one thing that really stuck out to me was the way they portrayed the native Alaskan man that was Bugs’ foe. With new eyes, I noticed his oversized lips, his bug-eyed gaze, and worst of all, his unintelligible grunting.

What ever gave us the idea that we had the right to portray human beings, made in God’s image, in such a caricatured and offensive way? Oh yeah, I remember now. It was that fabulous race “science” in the nineteenth century . . .

There’s a great deal of debate online about the censorship and editing that has gone on to remove these scenes (and in some cases, entire cartoons) from the public record, and I tend to agree that they should not be eliminated completely, with the notion that those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it. But I’m more troubled by what depths of depravity we are capable of, and by the message I was getting every Saturday morning of my childhood without even realizing it.